People were asking why I had not commented on
Wang Hui’s plagiarism scandal. It’s not that I didn’t care. Truth is, I had selfish reasons for keeping silent. The two recent open letters that stirred the water,
one by Chinese scholars and the other
by international scholars, have been dubbed as tit for tat, and I have friends in both camps of signatories. Is my opinion on this more important than friendship? For a while I was unsure. That was the main concern. Another – somewhat petty – motivation was to steer clear of suspicion of personal grudge.
Not that I know Wang Hui personally. Not really. I was a long-time reader of
Du Shu (读书) magazine, and I liked it so much that I even subscribed from the US, which is quite expensive. In my opinion it was during Wang Hui’s tenure as the editor that the magazine was the most interesting, thought provoking, and richest in content. (With a different editor now, the magazine has become somewhat boring.) I had always thought it’d be fun to chat with Wang Hui if there were a chance.
A few months ago, I attended the “Red Legacy in China” forum at Harvard University; Wang Hui was one of the speakers. This was the first time I saw Wang Hui in person. After the meeting, I went up to say Hello in the hallway. I had already heard about his plagiarism scandal then, but I had no intention of mentioning it (and never did). All I wanted to say was how much I enjoyed
Du Shu under his editorship, with a slim hope for an intelligent conversation.
What I got was totally unexpected. Wang Hui showed nothing but rudeness to me. So much so that later Bob, who was waiting for me aside at the time, said, “Wow, that guy’s a real asshole. Either that, or he really needed to go to the bathroom.”
Recent Comments